Waterfall Payment

A waterfall payment is a type of payment scheme in which higher-tiered creditors receive interest and principal payments first, while the lower-tiered creditors receive principal payments after the higher-tiered creditors are paid back in full. Debtors typically structure these schemes into such traunches to prioritize the highest-principal loans first because they are also likely the most expensive.

For example, this type of plan works best for a company repaying more than one loan. Assume this company has three operating loans, each with different interest rates. The company makes principal and interest payments on the costliest loan and makes only interest payments on the remaining two. Once the most expensive loan is paid off, the company can make all interest and principal payments on the next, more expensive loan. The process continues until all loans are repaid.

Imagine a waterfall cascading down into vertically aligned buckets. The water represents money, and the buckets represent creditors. The water fills the first bucket first. The second bucket will fill only after the first is full. As water flows, more buckets are filled in the order in which they appear. Typically, bucket sizes (size of debt) decrease as the water descends. This is likely because paying off larger debts reduces the risk of insolvency and frees up cash for operations, capital expenditures, and investments.

[Important: A waterfall payment is a system of prioritized payments to creditors, with higher-tiered creditors receiving interest and principle first and lower-tiered creditors receiving their portions thereafter.]

To demonstrate how a waterfall payment scheme works, assume a company has taken loans from three creditors, Creditor A, Creditor B, and Creditor C. The scheme is structured so that Creditor A is the highest-tiered creditor while Creditor C is the lowest-tiered creditor. The arrangement for what the company owes each of the creditors is as follows:

1. Creditor A: is owed a total of $5 million in interest and $10 million in principal.
2. Creditor B: is owed a total of $3 million in interest and $8 million in principal.
3. Creditor C: is owed a total of $1 million in interest and $5 million in principal.

Assume in year one the company earns $17 million. It then pays off the entire $15 million owed to Creditor A, leaving it with $2 million to pay off further debts. Since the priority structure is still in place, this $2 million must be applied to Creditor B. Assume the company pays $1 million to Creditor B for interest and $1 million to Creditor B for the principal. The result after year one is:

1. Creditor A: fully paid.
2. Creditor B: is owed a total of $2 million in interest and $7 million in principal.
3. Creditor C: is owed a total of $1 million in interest and $5 million in principal.

If in year two, the company earns $13 million, it could then pay off the remaining obligation to Creditor B and begin paying off Creditor C. The result after year two is:

1. Creditor A: fully paid.
2. Creditor B: fully paid.
3. Creditor C: is owed $2 million in principal.

This example was simplified to show the mechanics of a waterfall payment scheme. In reality, some waterfall schemes are structured so minimum interest payments are made to all tiers during each payment cycle.

Key Takeaways:

• Higher-tiered creditors usually have the highest principle and interest balances among all creditors.
• Waterfall payments can be structured to pay off one loan at a time or pay all loans in a systematic fashion.